Albuquerque Public Schools Cuts Middle School Athletics, while Per-Pupil Spending Outpaces Nation/Other NM Districts

UPDATE: The original chart displayed in this post contained data that made APS’ spending look even more out of line with spending in other school districts. This is because of a discrepancy over total spending vs. operational spending.. APS annual spending exceeds other large New Mexico school districts (we are waiting for full data from Santa Fe) and, most notably, neighboring Rio Rancho. We apologize for the error.

When compared to other major school districts throughout New Mexico, Albuquerque Public schools are very well-funded and should face increased demands for efficiency. “That’s the conclusion of a Rio Grande Foundation analysis of the overall budgets of a few of New Mexico’s larger school districts,” said Foundation President Paul Gessing.

“Our methodology was extremely simple,” said Mr. Gessing, “We found the annual budget and divided it by total student enrollment.” For Albuquerque Public Schools, that meant dividing the $1.34 billion found on page 44 of the APS budget by enrollment of 84,138 as found on page 32 of the same document. This yielded annual per-pupil spending approaching $16,000 annually.

Said Gessing, $16,000 annual spending per-pupil is far higher than the national average (which is closer to $11,000 per-student) and, per the Foundation’s analysis using data from a few districts throughout the State, far more per pupil than other districts.

Concluded Gessing, “The decision by APS to eliminate middle school athletics is hardly driven by budget cuts or the State’s difficult situation. Rather, it smacks of retribution and political posturing by New Mexico’s largest and biggest-spending school district. The term ‘Washington Monument Syndrome’ certainly applies to APS’ tactics.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

2 Replies to “Albuquerque Public Schools Cuts Middle School Athletics, while Per-Pupil Spending Outpaces Nation/Other NM Districts”

  1. APS, for all practical purposes, is a subsidiary of the teachers’ union. The union endorsed a majority of the board members as well as the superintendent. So it’s no accident that APS has been most resistant to the state-driven reforms that have improved results in other school districts. It’s a classic example of what happens when schools are operated for the benefit of the adults they employ.

  2. Hold on. If I am a motivated teacher and find 20 kids to teach at my home the State should pay me $320,000 dollars for 180 days of instruction? Why do I think the 20 children in my home would be better prepared than government school kids?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.