The inevitable consequences of New Mexico’s profoundly unwise expansion of Medicaid are coming into sharper focus. But fiscal policy has two components: expenditures and revenue. And serious pressure is starting to build on the cash side of New Mexico’s budget.
The Land of Enchantment isn’t alone. Energy-dependent states and provinces are feeling the pain:
* In Oklahoma, the governor has “ordered state agencies … to prepare to cut nonessential expenses by 10 percent.”
* Wyoming‘s Consensus Revenue Estimating Group has “calculated projected losses through June 2018” of $617 million.
* Alaska is facing down a $3 billion deficit, and legislators are examining the incentives the state uses “to get companies to come to Alaska, produce oil and gas, and generate jobs and economic activity.”
* Alberta is projecting “a record deficit on falling revenue.”
It appears that austerity (being rather generous with the term) will remain the standard operating procedure for New Mexico’s budget:
But while spending has been fairly flat in recent years, a two-decade perspective reveals a very different trend. Between 1993 and 2013, per capita, inflation-adjusted spending in New Mexico rose by 47.5 percent:
There appears to be a lot of room in the budget for right-sizing. Pro-taxpayer legislators should get to work on what programs and bureaucracies to cut, combine, contract, compress, and condense.
One Reply to “The Other Side of the Fiscal Crisis”
I dislike the first graph above. The ordinate starts at 0; it would be more informative if the ordinate started at 16 — one could then see year-to-year changes more easily.