Winning an election = following the science?

In a post yesterday we reminded New Mexicans that skeptics of lockdowns and other extreme COVID policies were right and those (like Gov. Lujan Grisham) who imposed such policies were wrong.

Apparently one of New Mexico’s most prominent bloggers believes that determining scientific accuracy is based on a reelection vote in which the Gov. ran on completely unrelated issues including “democracy” and abortion.

To reiterate, Sweden bucked the global lockdown trend in 2020 and wound up outperforming on a number of important data points.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

3 Replies to “Winning an election = following the science?”

  1. So the moral is anything is justified as long as you win. And once you win none of your past actions can ever be “wrong”.

    This is truly evil. This path leads to genocide. Is this where we are as a society? If so then God help us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.