During the 2024 legislative session (at the behest of Gov. Lujan Grisham) the Democrat-controlled Legislature passed (and Gov. signed) HB 41 which mandated adoption of a so-called “Clean Fuel Standard.”

That bill passed the House narrowly on a 36-33 vote with several Democrats joining Republicans in opposition, but it was enough to get the bill through. Public meetings have been held with final implementation scheduled for sometime in Spring of 2025. New Mexico will then become one of four states with such regulations on the books.

As the Rio Grande Foundation’s new policy brief, “Modeling the Cost of New Mexico’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard” finds:

The “clean fuel standard” will phase in gradually, with the aim of achieving a 20% reduction in carbon intensity below a 2018 baseline by 2030 and a 30% reduction by 2040.

Using the formula provided by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and the average credit price in Oregon for the year 2023 ($129.75 per credit), Always On Energy Research (AOER) determined that these regulations will increase gasoline and diesel prices by 30 cents and 34.7 cents per gallon, respectively, by 2030. By 2040, the regulations will cause gas prices to be 45 cents per gallon higher than they otherwise would be, and diesel prices will be 52 cents higher.

Politicians have a long and unfortunate track record of enacting policy X and, when policy X fails, rather than repeal X they move quickly along to foisting additional freedom-stealing policies on the people.

Take plastic bag bans as an example. New Jersey enacted a statewide plastic bag ban in 2020. Rather than helping the environment, the best study of the results of the law found that banning plastic bags actually INCREASED both CO2 emissions AND plastic consumption. It wasn’t a trivial amount, it was by a lot.

Now, as the left-wing Los Angeles Times editorial board writes of the failure of California’s plastic bag ban, ” in 2014 California tossed about 157,385 tons of plastic bag waste into the trash. In 2022, plastic bags accounted for about 231,072 tons of trash. That’s nearly 50% more.”

So, California’s anti-plastic policy is an abject failure. That means it will be repealed, right? Not a chance. In California a failed policy just means another opportunity to pass more bad policy. As the editorial argues, “We need a do-over — a second plastic bag ban that fulfills the promise that lawmakers made in 2014… (when the first ban was passed).”

To date, thankfully, no statewide plastic bag ban has been imposed in New Mexico although Las Cruces and Santa Fe have them in place. Albuquerque had one, but it was eliminated. A few other cities and counties also have plastic bag bans. 

The following appeared in the Las Cruces Sun News in August 2024.

In what can only be described as a “tone deaf” move the Las Cruces City Council recently adopted a proposed ballot measure (to appear on City voters’ ballots this November) to decide whether to increase the City’s gross receipts tax (GRT) rate by .5625% from the current rate of 8.0625% to 8.625%.

Las Cruces’ GRT is currently higher than either Albuquerque’s or Rio Rancho’s and will exceed Santa Fe’s (if the tax is adopted). More pressing is the fact that the proposed GRT increase would put Las Cruces’ rate above that of nearby El Paso (which has a sales tax rate of 8.25%).

Albuquerque’s rate is 7.6250%

Santa Fe’s is: 8.1875%

Rio Rancho is: 7.4375%

Let there be no doubt: the tax hike being voted on is massive. Of the various components (state and local) that make up gross receipts taxes in New Mexico, Las Cruces currently taxes its citizens at 1.5625% (the state rate is 5.0% while the County is 1.5%). That means the City is requesting a 36% tax increase for Las Cruces government. The City’s general fund budget just grew by an annual rate of nearly 10 percent in the latest budget.

It is hard for anyone to justify such a tax when the State has been piling up multi-billion-dollar surpluses every year. The mayor claims the money raised by this tax hike will be used for “critical infrastructure and public safety initiatives.” Why not ask Santa Fe to fund some of these items with a tiny portion of the State’s massive budget surpluses which have clocked in at $3.5 billion annually in recent years? There is also no “sunset” on this tax. If voters endorse it in November, they will be paying much higher taxes for years to come.

It’s not as if the gross receipts tax isn’t harmful. For starters, the GRT is a “regressive” tax which hits the poor hardest. It is hard to justify raising taxes that impact the poor, but that especially true when inflation continues to have a serious, negative impact on businesses and residents alike.

Speaking of businesses, it is well-known that the GRT applied in New Mexico cities like Las Cruces hits small businesses in ways that El Paso’s sales tax doesn’t. For example, in New Mexico contracting with an accountant, bookkeeper, and even buying advertising in your local newspaper are taxed. Up until 2023 doctors were taxed on deductibles and copays. The Las Cruces GRT taxes many items (especially those used by small businesses) that are simply not taxed in El Paso.

An honest assessment of the situation makes it hard to believe that this tax hike is necessary or justified. Will public safety really improve in Las Cruces if this tax hike is approved or are the politicians just using that to justify the increase?

After all, when presented by Gov. Lujan Grisham, a “progressive” Democrat, with an opportunity to improve public safety statewide, Democrats in the Legislature refused to act. This inaction drew the ire of Lujan Grisham who wrote, “The Legislature walked away from their most important responsibility, keeping New Mexicans safe.” For their part Republicans blamed crime issues in New Mexico’s cities on the unwillingness of liberal big-city mayors to enforce the law.

Clearly, crime is a complicated issue and with the City’s recent budget including robust growth it is hard to see how more money alone will improve the situation.

Las Cruces residents would be foolish to give city government a blank check in the form of a 36% tax increase this fall. The Rio Grande Foundation will be doing our level best to make that case between now and November.

Paul Gessing is president of New Mexico’s Rio Grande Foundation. The Rio Grande Foundation is an independent, nonpartisan, tax-exempt research and educational organization dedicated to promoting prosperity for New Mexico based on principles of limited government, economic freedom and individual responsibility

With so much talk of “universal basic income” in New Mexico (including a bill introduced in 2024 and a handful of pilot programs, even if they were not TRUE UBI programs), we were interested to see the results of one of the first real-world studies of a Universal Basic Income policy. The study from National Bureau of Economic Research can be found here.

The experiment involved giving 1,000 random low-income individuals $1,000 per month unconditionally for three years, with a control group of 2,000 participants receiving $50/ month.

Among the results: UBI participants ended up earning $1,500 less despite being given $12,000 more annually. For every dollar received, total household income dropped by at least 21 cents.

UBI participants remained unemployed longer than the control group. 

UBI participants worked less with no substantive change in quality of employment. UBI participants did little to improve their education or training to improve their income.

UBI participants reported higher rates of disability. 

In other words, the benefit of work appears to be more than simply getting a check. Of course, anyone who is even somewhat familiar with New Mexico’s social and economic issues would understand that one of New Mexico’s most fundamental problems is its low workforce participation rate. As the LFC reported in April:

Labor force participation correlates with economic growth, crime reduction, and increased average per capita earned income.

It’s Back to School time throughout New Mexico. If you’ve been following the battle over the Gov.’s attempt to force districts across New Mexico you may be aware that the issue has been tied up in court. That makes it unlikely that the Gov. will be able to impose her will before the school year kicks off. Would she demand schools suddenly switch mid-year (if she wins)? It is hard to say.

What IS strange is that the matter is now in mediation according to the Albuquerque Journal. Apparently the judge handling the case wanted a mediator. It is a strange request. Allowing 4 days or not allowing it and forcing schools to go 5 days a week is a fairly binary decision. The Legislature explicitly rejected a 5 day mandate as have more than half of New Mexico’s school districts. The question is whether the Gov. (acting without the Legislature) can impose a 5 day mandate. This strikes us as a judge wanting to avoid making a (politically) tough decision against the Governor. FWIW the judge is a Susana Martinez appointee.

On another note the Albuquerque Journal asked students what they thought of the schools they go to. The results are noteworthy. Some discussed a “lack of individualized learning.” Others decried “a lack of engaging, practical activities in the curriculum.” One said, “many of our young students are unmotivated to go to school.” One student rightly highlighted the harms of MLG’s COVID lockdowns stating “I think it’s caused such a discontinuity that it’s really inexcusable. They harmed a whole generation so much that we’ll be seeing those effects for years to come.”

As you’d expect the kids’ opinions are all over the place. What IS easy to see is that New Mexico is dead last in education. The existing system is not getting the job done. Mandating a 5-day school week is not going to improve things. Far-reaching reforms like school choice and Mississippi-style reforms are needed.

The University of New Mexico’s College of Public Health is now asking students (and possibly anyone else involved in the program) to sign a pledge detailing their commitment to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. The Pledge which is available at the College of Public Health website has a detailed description of what it means to commit to pursue DEI at the College.

The website includes “goals,” a “DEI action plan,” and an “Anti-Racism/Racial Healing Showcase”

The pledge itself also states clearly that “By becoming part of the UNM COPH, you are expressly dedicating yourself to this commitment.” On the flip side it also claims that, “This pledge is made solemnly, freely, and upon my honor.”

Notably, COPH is headed by Dr. Tracie Collins. Collins was Michelle Lujan Grisham’s Secretary of Health back in February of 2021 when she testified in court on the Gov.’s COVID mandates. The testimony exposed the lack of scientific support for the Governor’s COVID regime which ultimately failed to improve New Mexico’s COVID outcomes while doing demonstrable harm to New Mexico children. 

On the latest Tipping Point conversation Paul and Wally look at New Mexico’s “economic strategic plan” and encourage listeners to take a moment to comment on it.

Biden lays out plans to impose 18 year term limits on the US Supreme Court. We have thoughts.

A new study claims climate change has stopped Sun Belt migration. Is that the case? What drives the migration in the first place? Why is New Mexico missing out?

Agree or disagree with MLG’s crime goals, solving New Mexico’s crime problem is more complicated than new laws.

Ford earnings were recently cut thanks to losses on EV’s

A new study ranks New Mexico 2nd-worst for at risk youth.

Paul had a chance to visit with former Gov. Susana Martinez over the weekend.

Gov. Lujan Grisham has been focused in recent months on New Mexico’s out-of-control crime issues which she and her fellow Democrats have done so much to create, but we are now less than two years away from the start of her mandate that 43% of New Mexico vehicle sales be EV’s.

Unfortunately for the Gov. (and New Mexico’s car dealers which will be forced to sell unpopular EV’s) consumers are just not that into electric vehicles. According to the pro-EV trade group the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, in Q1 of 2024 New Mexico’s EV’s as a percentage of new vehicle registrations FELL slightly to 4.59%. See below which includes data for Q1 of 2024 (comparing it with Q1 of 2023).

New Mexico is not alone. The following from our friend Todd Myers of the Washington Policy Center shows that even in deep blue and wealthy Washington State EV sales are well below the mandated rate (they have a mandate similar to New Mexico’s). EV sales in Washington have also leveled off as a percentage of overall vehicle sales.

The share of new vehicle registrations in Washington that are EV or PHEV has stalled around 13% – the same level as April 2023.

35% of new cars sold – slightly different from new registrations – must be EV or PHEV in 2026.

WA is badly off the pace to meet the mandate. #waleg pic.twitter.com/PEc55cwXMO

— Todd Myers 🐟🌲🐝 (@WAPolicyGreen) July 29, 2024

Joe Biden outlined a new plan to, among other things, impose term limits of 18 years on Supreme Court justices. Rio Grande Foundation supports term limits for Congress and the New Mexico Legislature alike, but it is truly rich for Joe Biden who spent 36 years in the US Senate to bring up term limits for ANY public official.

More importantly, he and anti-SCOTUS voices like Rep. Melanie Stansbury have no authority to impose their policy preferences on the Court. That being said, IF Biden wants term limits on the Court, may I suggest he ALSO work to impose term limits on Congress AND the federal bureaucracy.

We recommend:

12 years in the Congress (6 terms in House, 2 in Senate);

18 years of employment in the federal bureaucracy. No more permanent “deep state.” If 18 years is long enough for the Court it should be enough for ALL federal employees.

At Rio Grande Foundation we plan for the future. We’re sure you do also. Thankfully, we probably do a much better job with our plans than the State. We encourage you to weigh in here on the State of New Mexico’s strategic plan. You have until August 31. It takes less than 5 minutes.

The Economic Development Department does a decent job of laying out six challenge areas which we have listed below (you can read about them in the full plan available here):

1. Lack of collaboration between economic development stakeholders
2. Difficulty attracting and retaining talent in urban, rural, and tribal communities
3. Misalignment between higher education and industry
4. Disengagement of socioeconomically disadvantaged communities in
planning processes
5. Public-sector dominance in New Mexico’s innovation ecosystem
6. Concentration of economy in a few key industries

It is hard to argue with them and we have made many points similar to those listed above. But, as usual, the solutions are lacking. What are OUR solutions? We don’t have much faith in state-driven economic development. We don’t know what the “next big thing” will be (and our politicians are MORE clueless and much more politically motivated to choose their own preferred industries).

What we know is that New Mexico’s tax structure stinks. The gross receipts tax is an unparalleled jobs and economic growth killer. It needs to be made into a sales tax immediately. Our income tax is an obstacle to growth and economic productivity and should be eliminated as well. Our education system is a disaster and needs to be reformed with a healthy dose of school choice and accountability. Finally, unforced errors like EV mandates, the costly Energy Transition Act, and New Mexico should embrace “Right to Work” and get rid of its costly “Davis-Bacon” prevailing wage law. 

If those policies were embraced in Santa Fe by the Legislature and Gov. we’d break through many of the “challenge” areas outlined above, but that would require politicians to stop favoring those who fund their campaigns rather than New Mexicans as a whole.

Again, take a minute and submit your comments to the Economic Development Department here.

Note, I had an issue submitting the form in Google Chrome, but it worked in Internet Explorer.

Our specific comments are below:

The State’s strategic plan makes many important points about challenges facing New Mexico. Sadly, government economic development officials have a terrible track record of predicting future trends and attracting businesses that will be successful. Instead, government should focus on basic economic reforms.

The gross receipts tax is an unparalleled jobs and economic growth killer. It needs to be made into a sales tax immediately. Our income tax is an obstacle to growth and economic productivity and should be eliminated as well. Our education system is a disaster and needs to be reformed with a healthy dose of school choice and accountability. Finally, unforced errors like EV mandates, the costly Energy Transition Act, and New Mexico should embrace “Right to Work” and get rid of its costly “Davis-Bacon” prevailing wage law. 

An article, backed up by a San Francisco Federal Reserve working paper claims that the massive shift in recent decades from colder climates to warmer places in the Sun Belt is reversing itself due to climate change. That seems to be a stretch based on Census Bureau data showing that 6 of the 10 fastest-growing states last year would be considered “southern.” 

If true, the shift back to the Rust Belt and other northern states would have profound implications for American politics and the economy. However, as the Yahoo Finance article about the report notes:

Southern states might still be gaining population for reasons other than weather. Some have no state income taxes and friendly regulatory policies that draw businesses and workers. Elon Musk, for instance, recently said he’s relocating the headquarters for his companies Tesla (TSLA) and Space X from California to Texas. Labor unions are less entrenched in the South, which has drawn many foreign automakers and other types of manufacturers.

Anyone who knows anything about New Mexico would agree with that. Virtually AL of New Mexico has plenty of sun. We also have warm places like Las Cruces and cooler ones like Santa Fe. New Mexico should be one of the best places to be, right?

What we don’t have is a strong economy (or a good education system and low crime). So, perhaps the issue all along that has prevented New Mexico from taking off is actually our bad policies and not the inherent attributes of our State?

Regardless of climate change I think the most economically-free states and counties will do just fine. Perhaps more interesting is that Americans just aren’t moving as much as they used to? 

Ford Motor Company had a very tough day on July 25, 2024 when it announced its earnings had plummeted by 35% due to the company’s EV losses. The company which is attempting to move to manufacturing electric vehicles (per mandates pushed by the Biden Administration, the State of California, and other states including New Mexico). Unfortunately, the shift to EV’s is not going well for Ford and their stock price plummeted over 18% today alone.

While New Mexico doesn’t have any Ford manufacturing facilities that doesn’t mean that EV’s financial challenges won’t impact average New Mexicans. It and other auto companies will have to shift costs from those money-losing EV’s onto the backs of the rest of us who buy and drive gas powered vehicles. Of course, this is just one of many ways in which the costs of EV’s are shifted onto the backs of taxpayers and consumers alike.

Taxpayer-financed charging stations, a lack of taxes levied for road repairs on EV’s, generous tax credits for EV’s, and numerous other subsidies hidden and not are going to take money out of YOUR pocket to pay for EV’s because they are inferior technology (in most cases) and consumers won’t buy them willingly at market prices.

The Gov. and Legislature are clearly not on the same page when it comes to adopting changes to New Mexico laws relating to crime. Democrats who have overwhelming majorities in both houses were completely opposed to what the Gov. attempted in the special session and thus essentially scuttled the whole thing. For her part the Gov. says she may bring the Legislature back for ANOTHER special session.

There are numerous issues here including the Gov. largely ignoring crime (and GOP solutions to it) for her first 6 years in office, but I want to focus more broadly on crime because the causes of crime are more complicated than just passing more laws in Santa Fe. For starters, the Gov. needs to lean on Albuquerque Mayor Tim Keller to enforce existing laws on crime. She could also nominate “tough on crime” judges to the bench. That’s not my conclusion, rather, that’s the conclusion of the Legislative Finance Committee which recently published a 37 page report on crime in Bernalillo County

Among the report’s findings was that “the criminal justice system in Bernalillo County has an accountability gap where arrests,
criminal convictions, and prison admissions do not keep pace with trends in criminal activity.” Duh. Anyone who lives in (mostly Albuquerque, not the County) recognizes that laws are not enforced, police don’t show up, and judges give light sentences of dismiss crimes in the first place.

But, there are even broader solutions that may take years to fully take effect, but will do more than laws to address New Mexico’s crime issues. They are: getting people (especially young men) into the work force and (of course) improving our education system. Here is a paragraph from an April 2024 LFC report:

If the Gov. really wants to address crime, she needs to propose and push legislative ideas that would improve New Mexico’s abysmal workforce participation rate. Republicans and Democrats will undoubtedly have different ideas for solving New Mexico’s workforce participation issues, but it is time to put that issue on the agenda in a serious way if we’re really going to address crime.

But, that would require the Gov. to ALSO have a serious discussion about New Mexico’s failing education system and its outsized role in failing New Mexico children. Sadly, MLG has expressed little interest in tackling education reform which would be unpopular with her union base. Instead she’s spent a great deal of time and energy attempting to force relatively successful rural districts to adopt 5 day school weeks.

Fresh off yet another 50th ranking in the annual Kids Count report and the left-wing Voices for Children’s attempt to pawn the results off as being due to the “poor performance of minorities on standardized tests,” another report, this one from Wallethub, gives New Mexico poor marks for child outcomes.

Unlike Kids Count, Wallethub ranks New Mexico “just” 49th beating out Louisiana, but overall it is not good news. New Mexico has large numbers of “disconnected youth.” As the time-chart map shows below that means 18-24 year olds not attending school or working.

Given New Mexico’s education shortcomings it is not a surprise that we have the highest percentage of youth without a high school diploma. What is somewhat shocking is that while New Mexico’s overall obesity rate is relatively low, the rate for youth is 4th-highest in the nation. The reasons for this are undoubtedly complicated, but MLG’s harsh COVID lockdowns cannot be dismissed as a cause.

Check out what Wallethub’s analysts had to say about New Mexico here:

The Rio Grande Foundation recently hosted Corey DeAngelis for a series of events in New Mexico. DeAngelis is one of the most prominent voices for private school choice in the nation, and at events located in Albuquerque and Alamogordo, he discussed the shortcomings of government-operated educational systems and the strategic methods of the left used to gain control of America’s schools.

DeAngelis’ solution to our failed education system is outlined in his new book, “The Parent Revolution: Rescuing Your Kids from the Radicals Ruining Our Schools.” Among other things, the book dives into the effects of COVID on our education system and how private school choice is rapidly spreading across America in response. The book is not only an informational resource for parents all over the United States, but a tool that equips them to fight back against the left’s constant push for ideological dominance. Under the phrase “fund students, not systems,” Corey DeAngelis is helping lead the charge in private school choice.

The COVID shutdown highlighted the tremendous control teacher unions have over our schools. Even as students fell more and more behind, unions continued to protest any notion of schools reopening, prioritizing “science” over students despite studies that proved schools were a low-risk environment. The National Assessment of Educational Progress taken in 2022 showed that test scores had fallen back to 1990 levels, yet unions ignored the growing disparity in student’s abilities. Their actions made it clear that they care little for students, but rather focus on making the system more beneficial for themselves.

By controlling educational systems, political progressives can efficiently spread their ideology and churn out more Democratic voters, making it in their best interest to create a system where parents have very little liberty to put their children into schools not controlled by the government. President Biden has even said: “There is no such thing as someone else’s child,” a frightening statement that neatly sums up the left’s beliefs.

Private school choice, on the other hand, allows for educational tax dollars that would be spent in a public school to be allocated to families looking to send their child elsewhere. That money is put into an ESA, or Educational Savings Account, giving parents more financial freedom to choose a school for their kids and determine what their child is learning, instead of a faceless government official. Parental involvement in their child’s education is an ideology that acts in direct opposition to the separation of parent and child that the left fights for, which should raise concern among parents.

Private school choice also encourages public schools to perform at a higher level, since it evens the playing field and makes for greater competition between schools. Parents, now having more options, will naturally choose better performing schools over others. Basic economics dictates that competition encourages innovation, so not only does private school choice help families, but also helps schools improve the quality of their education. Sadly, unions and so-called progressives will continue to fight against private school choice because it limits their power over students; but despite their protests, the movement continues to grow.

In just three years, 12 states have adopted universal private school choice: Florida, Alabama, Oklahoma, Utah, Arizona, Indiana, Ohio, West Virginia, North Carolina, Montana, Iowa, and Arkansas. In Arizona alone, 80,000 families have signed up for ESAs. The short time frame and large number of states passing these policies makes for a massive victory for private school choice, and other states are close to joining the list. Private school choice is an effective response against the constant push for dominance in education by the left, and funding students is a far more beneficial alternative to funding systems.

The latest edition of Kids Count provides more devastating news about New Mexico and the condition of our children. The report, created by the Annie E. Casey Foundation (a center/left non-profit that works nationwide) analyzes and ranks all 50 states based on 16 variables relating to childhood outcomes.

Surprising absolutely no one, New Mexico again was at the very bottom at 50^th overall. I analyzed the report and counted 7 variables that improved, 7 that got worse, and 2 that stayed the same relative to last year’s report. Based on this it is hard to point to any trend line pointing towards improvement.

That’s a problem for New Mexico’s left-wing politicians like Gov. Lujan Grisham, a majority in our Legislature, and the vast network of organizations that reflexively support big government schemes as the path to improving conditions for New Mexico kids.

For decades New Mexico has struggled to provide good outcomes for children. For decades we were told that New Mexico is a “poor” state and that if only we poured more money into government pre-K, K-12, and numerous other taxpayer-funded programs that improvement would come.

But, for the last decade the money to improve New Mexico has been available thanks to record-setting growth in oil and gas production. Despite massive spending growth in education and the creation of taxpayer-funded universal pre-K, our kids still face the worst outcomes nationwide.

If you cannot blame a lack of funding or failure of government programs to “move the needle” for our kids, what do you do instead? If you are New Mexico Voices for Children you blame “racist” standardized tests! In response to New Mexico’s poor performance on Kids Count, the organization wrote,

“New Mexico’s ranking in the education domain is heavily impacted by national standardized test scores, including fourth grade reading proficiency,” said Emily Wildau, KIDS COUNT Coordinator at New Mexico Voices for Children. “Reading proficiency is critical for students to succeed academically and as adults. These scores do not reflect the ability of our children, but rather an education system that is not designed with our multicultural, multilingual students in mind.”

Set aside the fact that standardized tests only account for two of the 16 variables contained in the Kids Count report. Also set aside that numerous other states with large minority populations outperform New Mexico (Texas and Maryland are two) or (like Mississippi) are showing dramatic improvement on Kids Count and other education performance indicators.

It isn’t just our education system that has failed to “move the needle” on difficult challenges facing New Mexico children. A December 2023 Legislative Finance Committee report found that “In FY23, New Mexico spent over $10.1 billion of state and federal funds on income support programs – $2.6 billion more than in FY19. Over the same time, poverty levels have remained stubbornly high with poverty rates staying around 18 percent.”

Rather than pursuing the failed government-driven model of more spending and more programs, New Mexico needs to change direction. Adopting educational choice costs nothing while empowering families to make the education decisions that work best for them. And, of course, with the massive budget surpluses available to them the Legislature and Gov. could and should embrace tax reforms and other policies that would diversify New Mexico’s economy and get more people involved in the best anti-poverty program we know of, a job.

Paul Gessing is president of New Mexico’s Rio Grande Foundation. The Rio Grande Foundation is an independent, nonpartisan, tax-exempt research and educational organization dedicated to promoting prosperity for New Mexico based on principles of limited government, economic freedom and individual responsibility

Sen. Heinrich and Rep. Vasquez BOTH told Biden to step aside before the weekend. That is simply worth noting as they are in competitive races and had the most to lose from a Biden disaster in the election. Biden said a “health issue” might cause him to withdraw. Then he came down with COVID.

Biden did this over X via a letter without a press conference. Biden hasn’t even been seen on TV or in public. Why?

If Biden is unfit to run for office is he really fit to be president for the next 6 months through January of 2025?

Who will Democrats choose to be their candidate? Who will be the VP?

Does the Democratic Party have any credibility at this point given their propping up Biden whose mental capacity had clearly deteriorated until it was exposed at the debate?

Will they choose immediately or go to the convention? Will replacing Biden be an open or closed process?

How are Democrats credible as defenders of “democracy” when Kamala Harris has never one a single delegate in a national primary?

Will Trump debate Kamala Harris? Should he?

Is Harris legitimate? Will she be seen as such by Republicans IF she were to win? Will Democrats and independent voters go for this or completely abandon democratic principles?

Is this a new way for the parties to game the system? What if the situation were reversed party/candidate-wise? Would the media or Democrats accept a Republican withdrawing at the last minute from the presidential race if their polling was bad?

Is Biden the worst president in American history or is Woodrow Wilson even worse?

A report from Learner.com ranks US states on education spending. But, it doesn’t stop with K-12 spending. Rather, they also include higher education. New Mexico has “free” college, but it has ALWAYS spent a great deal on higher education. Plus, due to a failing K-12 system New Mexico’s higher education system also needs to engage in remedial education.

New Mexico is ranked 4th-highest with a total-spend of $45,717 per-student. All of this spending has done little for New Mexico’s workforce readiness.  This report from the Department of Workforce Solutions highlights many of New Mexico’s issues which include low workforce participation rates.

Regardless of the merits of each of the bills and whether New Mexico’s crime challenges can be solved by passing more laws (as opposed to enforcing them) New Mexico’s GOP legislators were able to position themselves as “willing to work” with Gov. Lujan Grisham on crime. And, as she made clear in her post-session statement Gov. Lujan Grisham placed blame for the session’s failure (rightly) squarely at the feet of Democrats who control the Legislature.

Among other strongly-worded points, MLG wrote, “The legislature as a body walked away from their most important responsibility: keeping New Mexicans safe. But it is noteworthy that a majority of Republicans would have passed many or all of these bills — they were blocked.”

Does this mean thawing relations with the GOP or that MLG is might be willing to push some moderate GOP priorities (like GRT reform or tax cuts)? It is doubtful. But, with just months to go in the campaign, it would seem that GOP legislative campaigns have a ripe political issue in the form of the Democratic Party’s inaction on crime.

Two interesting aspects of the situation:

1. Gov. Lujan Grisham has had six years in office to address crime issues and make them a priority. Why call a special session NOW?
2. The Gov. and her allies have spent six years (including the 2024 Democratic primaries) working to make New Mexico’s Legislature as “progressive” as possible. But it is these very “progressives” (including Speaker Javier Martinez and Majority Leader Wirth) who remain unwilling to address crime. With the Democrats having moved even further to the political left in June (thanks to MLG’s efforts) how does she expect to get action on crime?

The case of the recent, failed assassination of former President Donald Trump is only the latest case of government incompetence. We don’t know ALL the details yet, but the mere idea that a shooter could gain access to such a nearby location from which to carry out a shooting is nothing short of inexcusable. Does the “Buck” stop at Director Kimberly Cheatle or not? So far, it seems not.

Ironically, in their recent debate Trump took Biden to task in their debate for not firing people saying:

“that the president should have fired the military leaders who were involved (in the disastrous 2021 withdrawal debacle.”

“No general got fired for the most embarrassing moment in the history of our country, in Afghanistan,” Trump said. “He doesn’t fire people. He never fired people.”

Even more troubling is the fact that as it enters (potentially) its last 6 months in office, the Biden Administration is attempting to make it MORE difficult to fire federal government workers. Of course there is the border situation and don’t get us started about Dr. Fauci and the federal health establishment!

And the trend certainly is not limited to the Biden Administration. Here in New Mexico Gov. Lujan Grisham certainly hasn’t held state government accountable (sadly, neither have voters). Our education system is 52nd nationally, crime is out of control, and of course there’s COVID and New Mexico’s awful performance. Yet, no one is fired.

We should ALL demand more from government employees (and the politicians who put them in their jobs). Firing people for doing their job poorly is not easy or fun, but it is part of running a good organization. Rather than having an entitlement mentality when it comes to a government job, government employees should truly live up to the title “public servant.” It is time to make firing government employees common again.

Paul went out of town for one of the momentous two week periods in American history.  The debate was a disaster for Biden. An assassination attempt against Trump. JD Vance was named his VP pick, Biden appears to be staying in the presidential race. Also, the Secret Service received a massive black eye due to their incompetence (which will be analyzed further in the weeks ahead). Where does all this leave us here in New Mexico?

The Congressional SAVE Act would require proof of citizenship to vote. Democrats including Gabe Vasquez and NM’s other Democrats voted no.

The special session kicks off on Thursday. Progressives and liberal Democrats are NOT happy. What is being discussed in the session? Are these policies concerning? Will they be effective in addressing crime? What should Republicans say and do about the session?

PNM has asked the PRC for a 23% rate increase to pay for ETA

Everything the left doesn’t like is a “power grab.” Specifically, we’re talking about the left’s reaction to some basic election related changes to City of Albuquerque elections.

Paul and Wally also provide an update on the status of election changes.

Las Cruces voters will vote on a massive tax hike this fall. 

Recently the Albuquerque Journal had an article discussing the need for a new contractor at the West Side homeless shelter. The article included one noteworthy line which we have highlighted below. According to it on June 20, 2024 the West Side shelter had 170 open beds. Now, thanks to a recent US Supreme Court decision cities are confirmed nationwide to be allowed to clear “homeless” off public rights-of-way and parks and other public spaces.

Sadly, Mayor Keller has never been serious about getting the “homeless” out of these public spaces. But, clearly, the problem is NOT a lack of beds.

This week’s podcast is a recent talk in Albuquerque given by Corey DeAngelis. Corey is one of the most prominent and effective advocates for school choice. He is also the author of the new book  “Parent Revolution: Rescuing Your Kids from the Radicals Ruining our Schools.” Corey visited Albuquerque and Alamogordo to discuss his book and the growing movement for school choice on June 17, 2024.

In what can only be described as a “tone deaf” move the Las Cruces City Council this week adopted a proposed ballot measure (to appear on City voters’ ballots this November) to decide whether to increase the City’s gross receipts tax rate by .5625% from the current rate of 8.0625% to 8.625%. Las Cruces’ GRT is already higher than either Albuquerque’s or Rio Rancho’s. More pressing is the fact that the proposed GRT increase would (if adopted) put Las Cruces’ rate above that of El Paso (which has a sales tax rate of 8.25%). 

Albuquerque’s rate is 7.6250%

Santa Fe’s is: 8.1875%

Rio Rancho is: 7.4375%

The Gross Receipts Tax is a “regressive” tax which hits the poor hardest.

It is also hard to justify such a tax when the State has been piling up multi billion dollar surpluses every year but inflation has hit New Mexicans’ bottom lines. 

Considering that Las Cruces currently taxes its citizens at 1.5625% (the state rate is 5.0% while the County is 1.5%) we are talking about a 36% tax increase for Las Cruces government. That is a massive and unnecessary blow at a time of record state budget surpluses.