Errors of Enchantment

The Feed

Gender ideology to hit UNM women’s volleyball team

10.03.2024

The San Jose State women’s volleyball team has a biological male playing for them. According to a recent New York Post article (and other reports) the Boise State and Wyoming volleyball teams have refused to play San Jose State’s team. Aside from the fairness issue there are well-documented safety concerns about having men play competitive volleyball against women.

If you are a fan of Lobo Athletics you may know that Boise State and Wyoming (as well as San Jose State) are all in the Mountain West which is the conference UNM’s Lobos compete in. San Jose State comes to Johnson Gym on October 17 to play the Lobos. We shall see what approach UNM’s volleyball team takes when confronted with a man invading their sport.

Also, with so much chaos having hit the Mountain West Conference it would seem that UNM and other members of the conference might have leverage to push back against allowing male athletes to participate in women’s sports. Of course, UNM is politically far-left even by university standards.

Blaire Fleming (#3) celebrates with the San Jose University women's volleyball team after a point during a recent match.

RGF looks at the 2024 statewide ballot measures (and a few local issues)

10.03.2024

There are a number of ballot measures both bonds and mill levies as well as constitutional amendments on the ballot this fall. Here are some details. The first group are on ballots statewide:

Bond Question 1 authorizing the state to issue $30,758,100 in bonds to fund senior citizens’ facilities.

Bond Question 2 $19,305,000 in bonds to fund public libraries.

Bond Question 3 $230,258,400 in bonds to fund public higher education institutions (this is one we take issue with as New Mexico’s higher education system is bloated). 

Bond Question 4 $10,297,100 in bonds to modernize public safety radio communications systems.

Constitutional Amendment 1

Extends a property tax exemption, currently only allowed for one hundred percent disabled veterans and their widows and widowers, to veterans with less than a one hundred percent disability and their widows and widowers and basing the amount of the exemption on a veteran’s federal disability rating.

Constitutional Amendment 2

Increase property tax exemption for veterans from $4,000 to $10,000 and index it to inflation

Constitutional Amendment 3

Authorizes the dean of the UNM Law School to designate the chair of the judicial nominating commission (rather than serving themselves). The designee will be an associate dean, faculty member, retired faculty member, or a former dean.

Constitutional Amendment 4

Authorizes county commissioners to set salaries for county officers (commissioners); this is currently set by the Legislature based on county size (This is one that taxpayers and voters should focus on. Allowing county commissioners to set their own salaries certainly raises concerns).

Local issues of concern

Las Cruces voters are deciding on a big increase to their gross receipts tax.

In Bernalillo County voters will decide whether to renew a 6.4 mill for UNM Hospital for 8 years: Local taxpayers subsidize the rest of the state through their support of UNM Hospital. There SHOULD be reforms made to share this burden, but that will ONLY happen if local voters demand it.

Bernalillo County voters will be asked to decide whether to keep Judge Cindy Leos on the bench in one of several retention elections. The judge will need to achieve 57% of the vote in order to remain on the bench. We have shared our concerns about her track record as a judge.

If you have a ballot issue on YOUR local ballot that we failed to discuss here, please send us an email: info@riograndefoundation to let us know where you’re from and what the issue is. We’d like to have a comprehensive list by the start of early voting.

New Mexico K-12 (preliminary) data indicate stagnant education results

09.30.2024

According to the Santa Fe New Mexican preliminary state testing data show “stagnant” results. As the article begins:

Student achievement data from the past school year is out — and it’s more of the same.

Reading proficiency for students in New Mexico public schools is stagnant at 38% and math proficiency is down two percentage points to 22%, according to test data from the end of the 2023-24 school year.

This MAY be a surprise to Gov. Lujan Grisham and her accumulated total of 5 Public Education Department secretaries, but it is no surprise to us. After all, New Mexico’s education system struggled before COVID. The Gov. locked students out of school for over a year during COVID. That caused students whose families COULD leave to leave New Mexico or its government school system. And, in the wake of COVID New Mexico’s education system has remained largely as it was before with no significant improvements made (as were adopted in numerous other states).

We expect the NAEP results to be released later this year or at the beginning of 2025. Will New Mexico remain dead last in ALL FOUR categories once again?

As the following chart from Mountain States Policy Center highlights 29 US states have some form of private school choice. Sadly, New Mexico is not one of them. Notably, there are 187 studies on the impact of educational choice and the results are overwhelming in their support for choice having a positive impact on student outcomes.

Will New Mexico EVER turn its education system around? Not until parents, not the unions, exert control over what happens in our schools.

Judge: UNM can no longer discriminate against conservative speakers

09.30.2024

As we discussed in an October 2023 post, when conservative speakers came to speak at University of New Mexico they or their sponsoring organizations were often slapped with thousands of dollars in security fees. Former collegiate swimmer Riley Gaines who came to campus in 2023 is one such speaker.

Now, thankfully, a judge has ruled that such fees are unconstitutional. Why is that?

The University had been applying the fees because extra security was needed for those speakers who do not appeal to the left wing views of most administrators and students at UNM. So, the fees were needed to pay for additional security. But, that is essentially allowing the “mob” to veto potential speakers through their threats of violence.

So, this decision is good news for free speech. UNM has indicated they won’t appeal the decision.

MLG continues pumping oil and gas $$ into subsidies for politically-favored energy companies

09.27.2024

New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham has been making the national media rounds to tout her misguided and failed economic policies (in hopes of securing her next job with a prospective Harris Administration). Again, no matter what Harris says in the next few months of this campaign, having MLG speak at her convention should cause ANYONE deep concern. 

Here is MLG talking to MSNBC’s Morning Joe about her plans to bring “green” jobs to New Mexico. Of course, what she fails to acknowledge is that oil and gas revenues have given the state the money to pursue these misguided policies. Recently, a $942 million Industrial Revenue Bond was approved for her latest great “green” hope Ebon Solar. Like MLG’s other solar fantasy Maxeon, Ebon has seen its share price plummet as it loses money. Here is a detailed article on Maxeon.

New Mexico is the poorest state in the nation. This, despite the aforementioned record-setting oil and gas boom which average New Mexicans (especially those who do not work for or benefit from government programs) have not benefitted from.

Start video at 5 minute mark for MLG’s energy comments.

Tipping Point NM episode 644: What People are Saying about New Mexico’s Lack of Economic Freedom, New Mexicans Not Happy with The Economy and more

09.27.2024

Last week Paul was in Dallas for a conference talking about New Mexico’s lack of economic freedom with other leaders on the issue. What are people saying about New Mexico’s lack of economic freedom? 

Paul led Liberty on the Rocks in Santa Fe on Monday and then was in Farmington, NM for a Rotary presentation on New Mexico’s economy.

Paul’s new opinion piece on the Electoral College was run in the Santa Fe New Mexican.

RGF’s education project OAK New Mexico recently surveyed candidates for the Legislature on various education issues. You can find the questions and survey results here.

New Mexico’s politicians have a very government-centric view of the economy. 

MLG and other liberals express misguided “pride”in our high poverty.

A new poll finds New Mexicans not happy with the economy.

A recent Albuquerque Journal poll found New Mexicans are not pleased with Biden, but the same poll indicates they want Kamala.

California adopts a total ban of plastic bags:  CA governor signs law banning plastic bags at grocery stores | cbs8.com Carlsbad, NM adopted a plastic bag ban on a “temporary” basis Tuesday night.

RGF successfully pushes back against MLG’s “over the top” school lunch rules

09.26.2024

Back in April the Rio Grande Foundation helped lead an effort to push back against some pretty wild rules the Gov. and Public Education Department were considering imposing on school lunch programs statewide. You can see what those proposed regulations looked like and our thoughts here.

In a bit of good news the PED’s new regulations were just published and they are MUCH more reasonable than the original proposal. You can see them for yourself here. Here are a few highlights:

  • Fifty percent of weekly required meals with the exception of milk, shall be freshly prepared;
  • Students in grades K-5 must have at least 20 minutes to eat;
  • Donate unused food to students, food banks, or other nonprofit charitable organizations;
  • An emphasis on purchasing unprocessed and minimally processed food items in school lunches.

Unlike the original proposal which would have required massive investment in on-site food prep and composting, these rules are reasonable and dare we say even GOOD. Now to get New Mexico’s academic performance out of last place.  

643 Developments in Lobo Athletics and a Housing Marketing Update – Mackenzie Bishop of UNM Lobo Club and Abrazo Homes

09.25.2024

Paul and Mackenzie discuss the position that the UNM Lobo athletics  find themselves as five teams leave the Mountain West for the Pac-12 conference.  They also discuss the issues facing all UNM sports but particularly the UNM football program. The conversation then turns to the status of the New Mexico housing market and the factors and issues affecting supply and demand.

RGF provides public w/ information on homeless issue and economy at recent public events

09.25.2024

On Saturday RGF president Paul Gessing took part in the Braver Angels event in the International District and had the opportunity to lead off the conversation on homeless policy by arguing (in four minutes or less) why additional tax dollars are NOT needed to provide housing for the homeless.

On Tuesday Paul had the chance to discuss New Mexico’s economic challenges with the San Juan County Rotary Club.

NM sitting on $6 billion in unspent capital outlay (with the worst roads in the nation)

09.25.2024

New Mexico is awash in money. Unfortunately, the money is neither benefitting residents of the poorest state in the nation, nor is it being returned to residents of the state in order to boost the economy and offset the costs of recent inflation. 

We have previously reported on the $54.7 billion the State is sitting on, but according to a new report New Mexico is ALSO sitting on another $6 billion in unspent capital outlay money. According to Source NM, “What’s most eye-catching in that pot of $4.5 billion is the list involving projects where, according to the Legislative Finance Committee, there is “no activity, no or minimal reporting … significant challenges or delays, or significant unspent funds.”

The report rightly notes that New Mexico has a “unique” approach to capital outlay. We’d call it yet another failure of New Mexico government. New Mexico’s poor roads are not just a figment of your imagination. According to a report from John Foy Associates New Mexico has the VERY worst roads in America.

According to the report New Mexico’s road problems are both rural and urban in nature:

  • Rural Rough Roads (Poor and Very Poor): 15.11%. This alarming percentage reflects a critical need for investment and improved maintenance of New Mexico’s rural road network.
  • Urban Rough Roads (Poor and Very Poor): 22.78%. The condition of New Mexico’s urban roads is also a significant concern, with nearly a quarter requiring attention to ensure driver safety and efficiency.

With $6 billion sitting unspent in capital outlay accounts it is simply impossible to justify a gas tax increase. Capital outlay reforms that dedicated money to improving New Mexico’s shoddy roads would be a worthwhile endeavor, but that would require leadership that we simply haven’t seen in Santa Fe.

RGF op-ed: Keep the Electoral College as founders intended

09.23.2024

The following appeared in the Santa Fe New Mexican on Sunday, September 22nd, 2024

Like clockwork, every presidential election we see a new set of attacks on the Electoral College. The Electoral College is the system by which the United States has elected every president since the founding. As you may be aware, the Electoral College was the result of compromise among the Founding Fathers to resolve conflicting interests among the colonies that ultimately agreed to adopt the U.S. Constitution, thus becoming the first 13 American states under the Constitution.

While the Electoral College has several components, the most salient to voters is the fact that instead of a popular vote, each state’s overall influence is calculated based in part on population and in part on simply being a U.S. state. New Mexico receives five votes in the Electoral College (of 538 in total) because it has two U.S. senators and three representatives in the House. California has 54 electoral votes for its 52 members of Congress and two senators, while Texas has 40 electoral votes for its 38 members of Congress and two senators.

Of course, a state’s total number of House members is based on population while every state has two U.S. senators. In other words, states’ influence over who wins the presidency is based heavily on population, but with extra weight given to those states that, like New Mexico, have smaller populations.

There are numerous benefits to this approach that may not be apparent to the average voter.

  • Candidates need to appeal to voters across the nation, not just in a few heavily populated areas.
  • While there is no fail-safe solution to voter fraud, the Electoral College reduces the potential for such harm by containing it in a few “swing” states. Politicians in California or Texas can’t manipulate the process to “run up” vote totals for their preferred candidates.
  • While recent rule changes (like mail-in voting) in some states have created problems in this regard, voters have a much clearer understanding of who wins the presidential election sooner than they would in a national popular vote where every vote nationwide must be accounted for to declare a winner (in a close race).

These are all good reasons to stick with the Electoral College, but there is another: New Mexico is a small state when it comes to population. And, while it has moved dramatically to the left (having become reliably “blue” in recent years), it wasn’t long ago that New Mexico was considered a swing state in presidential politics. Candidates from both parties visited the Land of Enchantment because our five votes in the Electoral College made a difference.

New Mexico is more likely to see interest among presidential candidates under the Electoral College.

Sadly, while the Electoral College shows no signs of being discarded, New Mexico is one of 16 states dominated by Democrats who have adopted legislation to abolish the Electoral College.

Fortunately, outside of New Mexico and these other reliably “blue” states, momentum to ditch the Electoral College has gained little traction.

In the run-up to Election Day, the Rio Grande Foundation is hosting events to further educate New Mexicans on the merits of the Electoral College. Trent England is the head of Save Our States. The organization’s mission is to defend the Electoral College and to make the case for constitutional federalism. England will be speaking at an event sponsored by the Rio Grande Foundation in Clovis on the evening of Oct. 2 and in Albuquerque at a luncheon Oct 6. More information including time, location and price is available at riograndefoundation.org/events.

Paul Gessing is president of New Mexico’s Rio Grande Foundation, an independent, tax-exempt research and educational organization dedicated to promoting prosperity for New Mexico based on principles of limited government, economic freedom and individual responsibility.

Surveying the legislative candidates on parental rights/school choice

09.20.2024

The education reform arm of the Rio Grande Foundation OAK New Mexico recently surveyed candidates for the Legislature on three basic issues relating to education in New Mexico. Those three questions were as follows:

Question 1: Do you agree that parents have the right to review their child’s curriculum as well as any additional school materials?

Question 2: Do you agree that New Mexico should honor the diversity and voices of families by preserving local control of board members over excessive rulemaking from the Public Education Department? This includes 4-day school weeks.

Question 3: Do you support allowing education dollars to flow to students and their families for the educational option that works best for them?

Check out the full results here. 

Latest poll finds New Mexicans say the economy not good

09.20.2024

Coming on top of other recent polling data from the Albuquerque Journal (including polls showing Kamala Harris winning New Mexico, Biden being unpopular, and MLG also rather unpopular (it’s evenly split) it is interesting to see the polling data below which relates to economic issues facing New Mexico. Of course, we know that nationally people are not happy with the Biden/Harris Administration’s failed economic approach, but one might think that with an unprecedented oil and gas boom in full swing that New Mexicans’ economic outlook might be a little bit more positive. As the data below highlight, that is not the case.

One might think that Harris would pay a price for her part in the Biden Administration and her likelihood of continuing the Administration’s unpopular policies, but that appears not to be the case. And, while MLG is not particularly popular, she is seen favorably by a slight majority of the electorate which is amazing because she has completely avoided doing anything of note with New Mexico’s massive oil and gas surplus.

 

 

Government-centric view of New Mexico’s politicians

09.18.2024

One of the serious “bugs” in the “software” of New Mexico politicians is their view that “government comes first.” In other words, economic policies should be designed to insure that State government and (to a lesser extent) local governments are funded while average citizens and businesses are an afterthought.

Speaker Martinez is by no means the ONLY New Mexico politician to have this mentality as outlined in his tweet below, but it is concerning to say the least. For starters, shoving money into “savings” overlooks the serious problems New Mexico is facing right now including: crime, highest in the nation poverty, lack of economic diversification, failing education system, and stagnant population growth (to name a few). While New Mexico government is thriving, New Mexicans are not. 

Even more troubling (to me at least) is the idea that in 15 years New Mexico government will have enough money that it can live off its endowment rather than relying on tax dollars. The implications for democracy and self-government are significant. Clearly, the Speaker of New Mexico’s House thinks this is all FANTASTIC.

But, a government that is sitting on so much money while the people of New Mexico face high poverty, crime, and a failing education system highlight the government-first attitude of too many politicians and the people who keep electing them. New Mexicans STILL hold the key to the future at the ballot box, but if the government doesn’t NEED the tax dollars they generate how responsive will they be?

MLG, left wingers’ misguided “pride” in New Mexico’s awful child poverty rate

09.17.2024

According to a new report from the US Census Bureau, New Mexico’s child poverty rate is highest in the nation. But, once you factor in a variety of “anti-poverty” programs that number improves significantly. That information generated praise from Gov. Lujan Grisham as well as Speaker Martinez (see below). It also caused New Mexico Voices for Children’s Emily Wildau to say “Absolutely, we should feel proud about it.”

So, what generated all this great news? Simply put, the Census Bureau has two different measures of poverty. The first and more well-known doesn’t include government programs. The other called the “supplemental poverty measure” does. That’s the one New Mexico sees improved performance in. Oddly enough (as seen in the table below) the programs included are all federal (making the self congratulatory tone taken by MLG/Martinez/Wildau) especially odd. A Medicaid expansion discussed in the KUNM article linked above is made out to be a big help, but that program began in 2024 after Census data were compiled.

Ironically for Wildau, the “Kids Count” report ranked New Mexico 50th overall (again) this year. One wonders how much the myriad government programs actually benefit children in impoverished families relative to those families working and earning the money themselves. Also, the Census Bureau also acknowledges numerous issues with the Supplemental Poverty Measure. Overall, this is a strange report to celebrate.

 

 

 

Tipping Point New Mexico Episode 641: Trump assassination attempt, polling, downtown ABQ, and economy/sports connection

09.17.2024

Trump was targeted in a second assassination attempt over the weekend. Paul and Wally discuss the details as they understand them.

Brian Sanderoff polling data released shows Harris/Heinrich leading in New Mexico.

MLG names close ally Marianna Padilla PED secretary.,

Paul and Doug Peterson discuss Mayor Keller’s plans for downtown in ABQ Journal.

The housing market is “broken” thanks to government policy. Now the government is supposedly trying to “fix” the problem. Will it work?

When economics and sports meet. The Lobos’ Mountain West Conference lost four members. Will UNM athletics land on its feet? How does New Mexico’s economic situation affect the situation?

Sen. Martin Heinrich recently floated the idea of a “Inflation Reduction Act 2.0” in the ABQ Journal. 

Former NMSU president Garrey Carruthers decries MLG’s meddling in NMSU presidential search.

New Mexicans: Biden is doing a bad job, but give us Kamala!

09.17.2024

It is hard to understand New Mexico voters. For nearly 100 years they have repeatedly chosen the Party that has led New Mexico to failure, but they show no signs of changing their ways. Worse, as we saw Kamala Harris replace Joe Biden just a few months ago, she has managed to build (as pollster Brian Sanderoff calls it “a comfortable lead” over Donald Trump) in the polls. Biden (or the Biden/Harris Administration to be clear), on the other hand (as another Sanderoff poll notes) is unpopular with a majority of New Mexicans.

Kamala Harris has outlined few policies of her own and has not provided detailed explanations on any policies of Biden’s with which she now claims to disagree. So, it is reasonable to believe that if elected Harris will be quite similar to Biden when it comes to governance. Sadly, for some New Mexicans, even thought they don’t like Biden or what Biden is offering they are likely to ask for more of the same failed policies in November.

That being said, only ONE vote matters and that process begins on October 19 with two weeks of early in person voting and concludes on Election Day Tuesday, November 5.

 

RGF op-ed: Mayor’s Downtown taxing plans won’t work because they don’t address crime and vagrancy

09.16.2024

The following appeared in The Albuquerque Journal It was co-authored by Douglas Peterson of Peterson Properties and Paul Gessing  of Rio Grande Foundation and appeared on Sep 14, 2024.

Albuquerque Mayor Tim Keller recently unveiled a plan — the latest of many such plans outlined by city officials over the years — that he believes will revitalize Downtown Albuquerque.

As the president of a think tank that offices Downtown and a major property owner Downtown, we, like all Albuquerque citizens, have a stake in improving Downtown.

The plan is based on two specific policies:

He wants to create a Downtown “tax increment financing” district, in New Mexico they’ve been called TIDDs.

Secondly, he wants to create a “Business Improvement District.”

Since neither of these are commonly understood concepts, here’s a brief primer.

A TIF or TIDD is a subsidy scheme that essentially allows tax revenues to be focused on the target area, in this case Downtown. Areas of town around the TIF are thus required to pay taxes to support basic government services for the TIF area as well. Allowing a TIF for Downtown would help Downtown, but it will hurt the rest of Albuquerque.

A business improvement district (BID) is a privately managed governance tool whereby property owners vote to agree to pay additional “taxes” in order to have some kind of private sector involvement that does things government can’t or won’t do. In Downtown this has typically meant cleaning up trash and provision of other supplemental services.

But Downtown Albuquerque’s needs are unlikely to be solved by either a TIF or a BID. Like much of the rest of the city, Downtown suffers from serious crime and vagrancy issues.

Can a BID address those issues? It is hard to say, but the market for office, retail and restaurant space in Downtown is soft to say the least. Downtown has not recovered from the COVID pandemic nor the 2020 riots and the uptick in crime and vagrancy.

Imposing new taxes on Downtown property owners without addressing crime and vagrancy is sheer folly, especially at a time when Bernalillo County Assessor Damian Lara, a former employee of Keller’s, has substantially raised property taxes on Downtown property owners by as much as 100% in some cases.

We believe that Mayor Keller could get tough on crime Downtown and elsewhere, but he has been in office for nearly eight years and hasn’t done so. Now he’s trying to foist additional costs onto Downtown without resolving to solve the problem.

Likewise, a TIF would funnel additional resources to Downtown Albuquerque, but in the absence of hiring more police and tougher enforcement of laws against public camping and vagrancy, more resources won’t really help Downtown. The former Downtown BID failed because it built a hierarchical, wasteful administration, including Keller fundraiser Brian Morris as the Executive Director, and spent more money throwing parties and holding nonsensical meetings than improving public safety.

While Downtown Albuquerque is certainly not alone in struggling to fill commercial space in a post-COVID environment, the governor and Legislature could do a great deal more to help. For starters, the Legislature and governor continue to benefit from massive oil and gas surpluses. While the state has socked away $54.7 billion for future use, Downtown Albuquerque is in crisis right now.

We don’t need a TIF or a BID. We need the Legislature and governor to get serious about diversifying New Mexico’s economy. Combined with a mayoral effort to seriously reduce crime and vagrancy, Downtown might be a more likely destination for business and economic activity.

That would increase property values and make Downtown a destination rather than a dangerous place people avoid.

We all should want a strong Downtown. Our city and state would benefit greatly from it. In any event, we stand ready to help.

Douglas Peterson is an attorney and president of Peterson Properties, the largest property owner in Downtown, as well as a two-time member of the former Downtown BID’s management agent, the “Downtown Action Team,” and the former chairman of the Albuquerque Environmental Planning Commission. Paul Gessing is president of Rio Grande Foundation, which is located Downtown.

When economics and sports meet (Mountain West style)

09.13.2024

For fans of the University of New Mexico Lobos this has been a tough week. Not due any losses on the field or court, but due to the loss of four teams (Boise StateSan Diego StateColorado State and Fresno State) from the Conference which puts UNM and other Mountain West Schools in a bind as they need to find a few schools to fill the void. More importantly, UNM missed out on being asked to join the “big time” of college sports while other schools they used to compete with are moving up to the historically prestigious PAC 12.

So, how is this connected with economic policies and the issues RGF works on in New Mexico? Let’s face it, college football drives all of college sports. College football is the financial driver of athletic departments. Therefore, all of this is being driven by a combination of money and football performance (including attendance and the like). UNM hasn’t been very good at football for several years. Albuquerque (and New Mexico as a whole) also doesn’t have the corporate community (and money) that is available in Boise, San Diego, or Colorado).

Fresno is a lot like Albuquerque economically although more agriculture based, but they have a stronger team that has a proven track record of developing NFL talent and of high football attendance. Was UNM every part of the conversation? How about UNLV from fast-growing, economically-dynamic Las Vegas (but with a football team that struggles on the field and with attendance)? It is hard to say.

One thing is for sure. If New Mexico (either the Aggies or the Lobos) wish to compete in football it will help to have a more robust and diversified state economy. With a booming oil and gas industry generating massive oil and gas surpluses perhaps those Lobos and Aggies in the Legislature (not to mention MLG who is a Lobo) perhaps “big time” college sports would be enough to convince them to embrace the need for fundamental tax reform, overall tax reduction, and economic diversification? 

 

Tipping Point New Mexico Episode 640: David Osborne – The Battle for Worker Freedom: Grading State Public Sector Labor Laws

09.12.2024

On this week’s interview Paul talks to David Osborne of the Pennsylvania-based Commonwealth Foundation. Osborne is Senior Fellow of Labor Policy and helped author the recent report “The Battle for Worker Freedom: Grading the 50-states public sector labor laws.”  Unsurprisingly New Mexico does not fare very well in the report with a “D-” ranking overall.

Paul and David discuss the report, their views on public sector unions, and some history relating to public employee unions and recent policy developments. Check out this important conversation! You can see the map highlighting New Mexico’s results relative to the other 49 states below:

Heinrich floats “Inflation Reduction Act 2.0”

09.11.2024

President Biden recently admitted that the Inflation Reduction Act was “really a climate change bill.” Other news outlets including PBS have regularly noted that “reducing inflation was not the point” of the bill in the first place. Instead, what we have is a costly and inefficient “green” boondoggle. In fact Goldman Sachs said the law will cost $1.2 TRILLION. That’s three times what Democrats have claimed.

With that, it is utterly unsurprising that not only did Sen. Martin Heinrich support the original legislation, but he has actually called for ANOTHER massive “green” spending bill similar to the IRA. He recently told the Albuquerque Journal,

An IRA 2.0.

That’s what Heinrich hopes for the future, “if we have the right stars align in Congress.”

“If you look at the IRA, it is really the culmination of the last 16 years of legislating.

Of course Heinrich’s own statement is an admission that the IRA had nothing to do with reducing inflation. The bill included a bunch of left-wing Democrat priorities that had been around for 16 years. Instead, the law is a grab bag of so-called “renewable” energy subsidies, EV charging stations (which have been extremely slow to roll out), and numerous other so-called “green” agenda items that Heinrich and the left have wanted for years.

Of course, Heinrich wants even more with a second version of the law because Heinrich’s TRUE constituency is the radical environmental groups and their aligned interests who suck up tax dollars while doing little (or worse) for the environment.

Operating two EV charging station costs Socorro taxpayers nearly $32K (due to costly electricity demand charges)

09.10.2024

EV charging stations are often portrayed by the Biden/Harris Administration and Michelle Lujan Grisham as winning technology that make EV’s more accessible for all. In addition to subsidizing the cost of these stations this report from Socorro’s Defensor Chieftain newspaper highlights the long-term costs of EV charging stations that local governments must bear on their own. The problem is that electricity isn’t free and as it turns out, large amounts of electricity purchased at certain times can result in high costs being passed on to taxpayers (see end of this post).

As the article begins, “It was little more than a year ago when the City of Socorro’s past and future coincided as two electric vehicle charging stations were constructed near the city’s historic plaza.

However, the future of green-energy transportation has done nothing more than shortchange the city’s coffers. For every $1 the city brings in, the expense is $3.”

According to the article, here are the expenses for the two EV chargers in Socorro:

The transformer at the plaza had to be upgraded so it had enough capacity for the electricity required to run the charger, which incurred a $49,000 expense paid to the Socorro Electric Co-operative.

The city has spent just shy of $40,000 on the project. Plus, it had to pay $27,000 for a four-year service agreement with ChargePoint to run the charging stations in addition to replacing the road that was dug up, which cost an estimated $10,000.

City records indicate in a period of nine months, from November of 2023 to June of 2024, it has received a mere $10,649.07 from fees for the two charging stations.

During the same time frame, the city has paid more than $31,897.10 in expenses. Almost all the expense is electricity purchased from Socorro Electric Co-operative because of demand charges.

Sadly, it seems, even once EV charging stations are purchased and working (at taxpayer expense, of course) they continue to impose additional costs (possibly on local taxpayers).

charging station

Government broke the housing market: can it fix it also?

09.10.2024
    1. Impose an eviction moratorium during COVID 19 (which exacerbate housing affordability problems in the rental market and ultimately hurt the very people they were intended to benefit.);
    2. Increase inflation (including the cost of construction materials and interest rates on home purchases) dramatically: according to the legislative finance committee construction prices have gone up dramatically.
    3. Impose costly new (supposedly green) regulations on construction of homes and apartments. 
    4. Unnecessarily limit land use via zoning and “open space” rules.
    5. By allowing crime to run rampant in certain areas there is a lack of interest in living in certain areas.
    6. Retain a tax regime that unnecessarily increases costs on builders. 

So, there is a housing “shortage” and prices are rising. Enter government. Albuquerque recently enacted significant tax breaks on a few housing projects. Of course, if similar tax breaks were offered to ALL home/apartment construction that would immediately have a positive impact on housing availability. And, Kamala Harris has offered her own housing plan which also includes a variety of subsidies and some undefined ideas for increasing the housing supply.

These problems are created by various federal, state, and local policies. While everyone recognizes there is a problem, there is a clear lack of willingness to actually solve the root causes of the issues. Instead, the plan (to the extent there is one) appears to be to simply throw more money at housing and hope that solves it. The obvious solution is to reduce taxes and unnecessary regulations on housing construction, not just on “favored” projects, but on ALL housing.