Paul Gessing interviewed on the upcoming legislative session
01.15.2013
I discuss the likely path of the 2013 legislative session and what that means for New Mexico’s struggling education system and economy. Click the interview link here.
I discuss the likely path of the 2013 legislative session and what that means for New Mexico’s struggling education system and economy. Click the interview link here.
Health care is among the most heavily-regulated areas of the economy. One particularly costly regulation requires health insurance companies to be licensed and regulated within their respective states. Among other things, this forces young, healthy individuals looking for "bare bones" insurance plans to pay for a slew of coverage items that they have no need or desire for and that dramatically increase the prices of their plan. New Mexico’s 59 mandates are more than all but a handful of states, thus driving insurance prices in the Land of Enchantment higher than necessary.1
Aside from the mandates, New Mexico is a relatively sparsely-populated state that allows fewer opportunities for "risk pooling" (the very point of insurance).2 This drives up the cost of health insurance plans in the state. Enabling additional health insurance companies to do business in the state along with larger risk pools will inevitably drive down the cost of this insurance.
The Public Regulation Commission should allow any insurance company licensed in another state to do business in New Mexico. Absent that ideal situation, the PRC should negotiate "compacts" with other states to allow reciprocity agreements between states to allow insurance companies licensed in one state to practice in both states.
The Legislature should undertake an effort to reduce or eliminate regulations, perhaps making them optional under certain low-cost health plans targeted at young people. Foisting 59 mandated coverages on anyone who purchases health insurance is like mandating that a young or poor person purchasing a car must buy a fully-loaded BMW or go without a car.
1Victoria Craig Bunce, "Health Insurance Mandates in the States, 2011," Council for Affordable Health Insurance, 2012, http://www.cahi.org/cahi_contents/resources/pdf/MandatesintheStates2011ExecSumm.pdf
2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_pool
Watch Your E-mail Inbox Tomorrow For the Next Installment
See the links below for prior articles in this series. |
Day 1: The Dire Need for Regulatory Reform in New Mexico
Day 2: The Economic Benefits of Deregulation
Day 3: An Introduction to Regulations and Solutions
Day 4: Eliminate Unnecessary Construction Licensing
Day 5: Build for Cost-Effectiveness and Efficiency, Not Arbitrary LEED Certification
Day 6: Simplify/Eliminate Occupational Licensing For Low-Income Professions
Day 7: Pay Market Wage, Not Union-Imposed Prevailing Wage For Public Projects
Day 8: Eliminate Common Carrier Regulations
Day 9: Increase Election Freedom and Election Competitiveness
Day 10: Adopt a Right to Work Law
Day 11: Adopt Teacher Certification System Based on Student Outputs, Not Inputs
There is increasing evidence that excellent teachers are among the most important factors in improving educational outcomes in public schools.1 Unfortunately, there is also a great deal of evidence that traditional teacher certification tools do not have a significant impact on teacher quality.2 The following chart illustrating the small impact of teacher certification.
It is widely-recognized that more, better, teachers are essential to improving our educational system, yet government licensing policies are designed to limit supply. A PhD physicist who has retired from Sandia Labs would need years of additional schooling to put their considerable schools to work as a teacher in the classroom.3
Teacher licensing is an issue both for those who would like to become teachers through alternative paths and for accomplished and effective teachers who would move up in terms of pay much faster absent the “three-tiered licensing” system New Mexico has in place.4
According to the New Mexico Effective Teacher Task Force:
The current teacher recognition process in New Mexico places emphasis on years of experience and credentials obtained. Members of the Task Force recognize these factors are important; however, they fail to offer teachers any acknowledge of student achievement. Many New Mexico teachers see the growth of students in the classroom, but work in a system that does not recognize or reward them for it.5
The Legislative Finance Committee recently confirmed the fact that teacher licensing in New Mexico is ineffective, saying: “New Mexico’s three-tiered career ladder system does not align pay with student achievement.”6
The New Mexico Legislature must enact legislation to allow for truly alternative teacher certification paths for qualified professionals. Eliminating the “three tiered” licensing system (which measures inputs) in favor of a system that measures and rewards outputs in terms of student achievement would also be sensible.
1Raj Chetty, John Friedman, and Jonah Rockoff, “The Long-Term Impacts of Teachers,” National Bureau of Economic Research, December 2011, http://obs.rc.fas.harvard.edu/chetty/va_exec_summ.pdf
2Robert Gordon, Thomas Kane, Douglas Staiger, “Identifying Effective Teachers Using Performance on the Job,” The Brookings Institution, April 2006, http://www.brookings.edu/views/Papers/200604hamilton_1.pdf
3New Mexico Public Education Department
4Teach NM, “3-Tiered Licensure System,” https://web.ped.nm.gov/bureaus/licensure/teacher-license-advancement/http://teachnm.org/home/3-tiered-licensure-system.html
5New Mexico Effective Teaching Task Force: “Final Report and Recommendations,” August 26, 2011; http://ped.state.nm.us/ped/TTFDocuments/NM%20TTF%20Report%20FINAL.826.pdf
6Legislative Finance Committee, “Promoting Effective Teaching in New Mexico,” November 15, 2012, http://www.nmlegis.gov/lcs/lfc/lfcdocs/perfaudit/Public%20Education%20Department%20%E2%80%93%20Promoting%20Effective%20Teaching%20in%20New%20Mexico.pdf
If labor unions were like any other private club or organization, an individual could choose whether or not to pay dues and become a member. Unfortunately, unions have been granted government protections over the years that have allowed them to dominate certain industries.
Simply put, "Right to Work" laws prohibit employers and unions from requiring membership in a union or payment of union dues as a condition of employment.
According to economist Dr. Richard Vedder, both population and income growth have been significantly faster in the 22 states with right-to-work laws than in those states that allow forced unionism. Texas, Oklahoma, Arizona and Utah all have right to work laws in place. Indiana became the latest state in the nation to adopt such a law. A recent Rio Grande Foundation paper found that New Mexico would have New Mexico’s employment in 2011 would have been approximately 21 percent higher had a Right to Work law been enacted in 1980.1
If New Mexico’s political establishment wants to stand up to special interests and create jobs, there are few policy prescriptions with better track records of success than passage of a "Right to Work" law.
1Eric Fruits, Ph.D., "Right to Work and Economic Growth: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Economic Benefits to New Mexico of Enacting a Right-to Work Law," July 2012, Rio Grande Foundation, http://www.riograndefoundation.org/downloads/rgf_right_to_work.pdf
New Mexico’s Constitution contains no requirements for individuals who are running for Legislature to collect a particular number of signatures in order to get on the ballot.1 The advent of of new ballot-access legislation prior to the 2012 filing period threw the ballot access process into into chaos due to insufficient attention to detail among more than a dozen legislative candidates (including several incumbents).2 Notably, these undue burdens, while impacting Democrats and Republicans alike, disproportionately impact third-party candidates.
Ballot Access Expert Richard Winger has cited New Mexico’s signature requirements along with Illinois, Massachusetts and New York as being among the most onerous in the nation.3 These regulations have repeatedly resulted in lawsuits against the state being filed by candidates of both major parties and third parties. The current ballot access laws are unwarrented and should be repealed. As long as the candidaye meets that Constitutional requirements (age, resident of the district, etc.) they should be allowed to run.
Competition is beneficial in politics, not just economics.
1Article IV, Section 3, http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Article_IV,_New_Mexico_Constitution
2Rob Nikolewski, "We’ve got one fine primary mess this year," Santa Fe New Mexican, April 8, 2012, http://www.capitolreportnewmexico.com/2012/04/commentary-weve-got-one-fine-primary-mess-this-year/
3Richard Winger, "Ballot Access: A formidable barrier to fair participation." http://archive.fairvote.org/reports/1993/winger.html
New Mexico’s Public Regulation Commission (PRC) is responsible for approving utility prices, regulating insurance, and licensing motor carriers.1 Among its broad regulatory powers, the PRC enforces "common carrier" regulations which fix the rates and limit the amount of individuals who can legally provide services such as tow trucks, taxis, moving vans, buses, shuttles, ambulances and railroads.2 Prospective companies seeking to enter the market must file a "certificate of public convenience and necessity" according to a report by Think New Mexico.3
These certificates are significant barriers to entry leading to higher prices and fewer options for consumers. It is not unreasonable to lable this relationship a cartel, which benefits the few well-connected and protected businesses at the expense of everyone else. Arguably, this marriage between public regulators and private businesses creates a symbiotic relationship that continues to block competition as well as engender an environment ripe for corruption. Clearly, the success of Carter-era deregulations discussed in our "Day 2" E-mail could be brought to New Mexico.
As well as being subject to the regulations of the PRC, motor carriers of passangers and household goods are also regulated by the New Mexico Department of Public Safety (DPS).4 These unwarrented burdens on businesses who seek to provide transportation services etc. must be challenged and abolished. The issue of safety should be exclusively regulated by the DPS and the PRC should curb its meddling in the transportation sector. By maintaining the status quo New Mexicans suffer from higher prices, innovation is stifeled, and fewer entrepreneurs are able to pursue their business ideas.
1http://www.nmprc.state.nm.us/index.html
2http://www.abqjournal.com/main/2012/10/07/opinion/use-power-of-your-vote-to-bring-prc-into-line.html
3"Think New Mexico," Rethinking the PRC, Fall, 2011.
4Ibid.
As mentioned in yesterday’s E-mail, President Jimmy Carter and Congress worked to deregulate several major industries during the late 1970s and early 1980s. These regulations set the table for the incredible economic growth of the 1980s and into the 1990s. As the following charts illustrate, deregulation produced significant benefits for consumers in terms of lower costs and increased options.
The following chart is from The Economist "High-Speed Railroading," July 22nd, 2010.
This chart is from Jonathan Chait and appeared in the The New Republic on August 5, 2010.
The following chart comes from Susan Carey and Scott McCartney and appeared in the Wall Street Journal on October 5, 2004.
As these charts clearly show, deregulation in a various industries has reduced consumer prices and increased competition in several major industries over the last three decades.
Watch Your E-mail Inbox Tomorrow For the Next Installment
See the links below for prior articles in this series. |