With Gary Johnson having been snubbed this week by having been excluded from the CNN debate, the race to oppose Obama in 2012 is really getting started. Interestingly enough, a recent poll by Public Policy Polling finds that of the “major” GOP candidates (Ron Paul was inexplicably excluded from the poll), Johnson is THE ONLY GOP candidate to have positive polling numbers in their home state.

Johnson as 44-32 favorability ratings here in New Mexico. This is good news both for America and New Mexico for three reasons:

First and foremost, it shows that CNN was wrong in excluding Johnson;
Secondly it shows that being a fiscal conservative is popular, even in a heavily-Democrat state like New Mexico (hopefully Gov. Martinez has seen these numbers);
Thirdly, it would seem to indicate that the people who know the various candidates best like Gary Johnson better than people in other states. Interestingly enough, Mitt Romney, former Governor of another liberal state (Massachusetts), the front-runner and father of the failed “RomneyCare” experiment, has polling numbers that have him 12 points in the negative among his home-state voters. It would appear that small government ideas are still more popular among voters than are big government ideas.

The Santa Fe New Mexican has reported that the loss of $1.2 million in federal funding could force the system to alter service in ways that might include:

Using bus service to replace the earliest northbound and southbound trains on weekdays.

Having other trains make fewer stops by bypassing the soon-to-open Sandia Station north of Albuquerque and the unopened Zia Station in Santa Fe.

Other changes might be made as well, but the fact is that buses can make the trip from Albuquerque to Santa Fe far more quickly than the train does. Also, the Rail Runner has built way too many stations into the system (slowing the train’s path), eliminating certain, little-used stops would be helpful.

With buses being far faster (1hr 9 min. vs. 1hr 38 min), more flexible, and cheaper than the train, it leads one to wonder why New Mexico taxpayers have been asked to pour more than $500 million into the train to date.

This fascinating report from the New Mexico Watchdog (a project of the Rio Grande Foundation), tracks judicial donations.

According to the report, “Members of the Richardson-era judiciary on average paid more than four times as much in political donations during recent years, compared to the recent political donations of long-time judges who remained through the Richardson era.”

Find out who donated how much and to whom here.

The Rio Grande Foundation caused a bit of a stir recently when we posted the salaries of County workers online. Interestingly enough, according to news reports, the new Mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel (a former Obama Administration Chief of Staff) has taken the same step with city workers in Chicago.

Said Emanuel of the decision:

During the campaign I promised to have the most open, accountable and transparent government that the City of Chicago has ever seen. Today’s effort is another step toward this goal, as we create an administration that is accountable to the citizens of Chicago.

Kudos to Rahm Emanuel for his leadership on basic governmental transparency.

HT to Sarah Welsh @ New Mexico FOG.

Greg Scandlen has an excellent post on American health care expenditures relative to those of other nations here. Folks on the left constantly talk about how much the US spends on health care and to an extent they have a point.

Problem is that, as the following chart illustrates (from Scandlen’s blog posting), Americans do not directly spend much on health care. Rather, the spending is done by governments and insurance companies:

How can this be rectified? Well, the first thing to be done is to equalize the tax treatment of health care so that employers are not given the incentive to buy insurance for their employers and that individuals take control for more of their health care spending.

Left-wing environmentalists like recent Albuquerque Journal columnist Edward Mazria love government regulations. In this case, the author is calling for more restrictive energy efficiency regulations on buildings.

As usual, he argues that 1) rather than costing money (or at least acknowledging that regulations have trade-offs), the preferred regulations have nothing but economic benefits; 2) Unstated, but implicit is the assumption that customers and consumers are too ignorant and uninformed to demand greater energy efficiency on their own 3) The regulations will save the world from the dire threat of global warming.

Simply put, Mazria fails to answer or even address any of these issues and instead simply asserts the need to use government force to demand that the rest of us simply fall in line with his personal preferences. Rather than falling victim to his scare tactics, New Mexicans should return to the old building code regulations and, if they prefer greater energy efficiency, the market will fulfill that wish.

Horace Greely is famously quoted as saying “Go west young man.” The idea was that success and riches could be had if a young man only had the courage to live on the frontier and make a better life for themselves. If Greely were alive today, he might say: “Follow the government young man.”

A brief look at this recent article from Forbes makes it very clear that Americans are getting rich by sucking up to big government. 5 of the 6 richest counties in America are either in the Washington, DC area or have other massive government installations nearby — number 6 is Los Alamos right here in NM with the Los Alamos Labs.

I long for the day when the best a young man or woman could do is to innovate and create products in a free market that serve others, not rely on a bloated and inefficient federal government to become wealthy.

HT: Hap Richardson

Our posting of the Bernalillo County payroll online has resulted in exactly the kind of transparency we hoped for. Commissioner Art De La Cruz is calling for an employee pay study to make sure that the County’s pay structure makes sense. The story is available here.

There is no single problem with higher education in general or higher ed in New Mexico in particular. We at the Rio Grande Foundation have discussed some reform ideas here and here, but local attorney and lobbyist Dick Minzner has some ideas of his own.

Specifically, Minzner discusses ways to improve and make more efficient the college lecture. Certainly, his ideas could save massive sums of money and would make college more affordable and accessible for students. The biggest problem (extrapolating from Minzner’s ideas) is that the colleges and universities have monopolies on pieces of paper called diplomas.

For more on reforming the undergraduate degree for the 21st century, I highly recommend these short podcasts from Charles Murray which can be accessed here and here.

There are lots of studies which focus on economic freedom and relative business friendliness, but a new report from the Mercatus Center at George Washington University called “Freedom in the 50 States” is relatively unique in that it explores both economic and social freedoms.

It will be of no surprise to regular readers of this space that New Mexico is among the most economically-unfree states in the nation (45th in this report). The good news, at least for social liberals and libertarians is that New Mexico scores 10th best on measures of personal freedom.

By way of summarization, the report’s authors had the following analyses and recommendations for New Mexico policymakers:

Analysis

New Mexico is the laggard of the Mountain West, but like several other small, rural states, it does well on personal freedom. Spending and taxes are high, fiscal decentralization is low, and a fifth of the state’s workforce is on state or local government payrolls (this ratio did drop consistently from 2004 to 2008). The state does well on personal freedoms because gun control is light, several kinds of gambling are allowed, private-school regulation is light (but homeschool regulation is tougher by national standards), there is RFRA, asset forfeiture has been partly reformed, a medical marijuana law has recently been enacted, and victimless-crimes arrest rates are low. However, the state recently expanded the ages of mandatory school attendance and enacted sweeping smoking bans. In economic regulation, New Mexico could improve most by rolling back health-insurance coverage mandates and occupational licenses. Eminent domain was reformed in 2007.

Policy Recommendations

Roll back occupational licenses, such as those for teacher assistants, ambulance drivers, mobile-home installers, pipelayers, boilermakers, bartenders, and dental assistants.

Repeal health-insurance mandated coverages for services such as lay midwives, acupuncturists, TMJ treatment, bone-mass measurement, home health care, and IVF.
Spending on higher education, police, and corrections is high; these areas should be targeted for reduction with the savings applied toward cutting the gross-receipts tax.

Many on the left (including President Obama) are blaming corporations in particular and businessmen in general for sitting on hoards of cash and not investing and creating jobs. The idea is that these businesses are generating returns and should be hiring and investing. Of course, this is a political issue for the Obama Administration as the economy is the number one issue facing his presidency these days.

Winthrop Quigley recently took up the mantle for Obama in the Albuquerque Business Journal when he accused businessmen of “cowering behind piles of cash.” I felt this was an unfair criticism and responded with a letter to the editor:

Winthrop Quigley began his recent column on businesses and risk-taking with a lengthy and quite legitimate laundry list of reasons why businesses are leery to hire large numbers of new workers and make major investments. Then he calls those concerns “a crock” and makes a variety of statements that just don’t make sense.

For starters, he cites the courage of Intel in making new investments in 1980 during a time of high interest rates and economic uncertainty. Of course, Quigley fails to mention that both Carter and Reagan enacted a series of pro-growth tax and regulatory reforms that provided reason for optimism. The two men succeeded in killing stagflation, but the leadership to solve today’s more intractable problems of out-of-control spending and debt is nowhere to be found.

Quigley cites opportunities to privatize infrastructure – a great idea – and improve health care – impossible if Washington doesn’t dramatically alter or abolish ObamaCare – and questions where businesses are. Well, I don’t know any businessmen who don’t want to make money for themselves and their investors. If anything, the current bout of caution is simply a response to the heedless optimism of the last decade.

Threatening to force businesses to hire and spend is obviously the wrong thing to do. Government can do its part by providing political certainty on taxes and regulations and tackling the fiscal crisis facing the nation. Given these needed changes in Washington, I’m sure that this “crisis of confidence” will soon pass.

Paul J. Gessing
President
Rio Grande Foundation
PO Box 40336
Albuquerque, NM 87196
505-264-6090

Over the weekend, the Journal’s front page carried an interesting article on the difficulties facing young people in finding gainful employment.

It is no surprise that unemployment rates for young people are higher than for the general population. These are, after all, unskilled workers with short employment histories and lower education levels as a group. But, the sad thing is that minimum wages force employers to either overpay young people or not hire them at all. In a weak economy, they tend to not hire at all.

Economist Walter Williams, a national treasure in my opinion, was on John Stossel’s show last week. He explains in the following interview why things like minimum wages and licensing laws actually hurt minorities and young people by forcing them out of certain jobs:

Rio Grande Foundation board member Vic Bruno had an opinion piece in the Albuquerque Journal over the weekend that outlined and explained several of the reforms included in our new policy paper on economic development.

Recently, Gov. Martinez and the State Investment Council have won plaudits for changes they have made to the state’s film loan program. We too are encouraged by these needed reforms.

But, as Joe Henchman of the Tax Foundation writes in a new paper, New Mexico is just one of many states that have cut back dramatically — or eliminated entirely — subsidies for filmmakers. That $50 million could instead be applied to lower the corporate or personal tax rates for all New Mexicans, thus spurring sustainable economic development.

The Environmental Improvement Board has voted to adopt the less-stringent, less-costly haze restrictions on the Four Corners power plant. We applaud this move and hope the EPA is willing to accept the state-level regulations.

Nonetheless, during the public testimony period on the issue, I made sure to add the Rio Grande Foundation’s voice in support of the more reasonable haze reduction measures.

(Albuquerque) Expensive studies are in the works and much discussion is taking place on the best ways to develop New Mexico’s economy. This is great news to advocates of the free market. For too long, economic development in New Mexico meant waiting for the federal government or the Labs to bring more jobs and money to the area.

Of course, some politicians and economic development “experts” are hoping to promote their own visions of targeted economic incentives, tax giveaways, training programs, and other methods of bringing jobs to New Mexico. At best, these methods are unproven in terms of generating net, long-term growth. Rather, the new plant or business may be “seen,” but the businesses and investments that would have happened absent those taxes is the unseen and untold story.

In an effort to steer the debate towards proven, pro-free-market policies, the Rio Grande Foundation has released its own study, “A Roadmap for a More Economically-Competitive New Mexico” that bases its findings on “tried and true” principles of taxation, spending, and regulation as a path forward for New Mexico’s economy. The study is available at the Foundation’s website.

Said Gessing, “Politicians and economic development ‘experts’ love targeted incentives because they give them power and a political constituency and financial support. But, true economic development comes from unleashing the inherent productivity of a given population, not from top-down decisions and resource-shifting.”

Gessing noted that “Reforms like ‘Right to Work’ laws have been shown to increase economic growth rates by 11.5% where they have been enacted. Elimination of state taxes on personal income have also proven effective with no-income tax states having created 89% more jobs and had 32% faster personal income growth than their high-tax counterparts between 1998 and 2007.”

“Other reforms,” Gessing noted, “including reduced regulatory burdens, better, more cost-effective educational systems, and reducing the size of New Mexico’s government work force, are designed to increase the effectiveness of government spending and/or re-direct resources from government to the private sector. These initiatives and ones like them have a high likelihood of driving economic growth and creating jobs.”

Gessing concluded that, “While the reforms contained in this paper WILL spur economic growth, they are also politically-challenging. New Mexicans and their political leaders must choose between political expediency and proven success.”

Channel 13 did a second story over the Memorial Day weekend discussing our efforts to increase transparency in Bernalillo County Government. And, while such efforts have caused consternation among some County employees, there were clearly disparities in pay that merited discussion.

This is a great video showing many of the craziest aspects of our allegedly “free market” health care system.

With a barrel of oil still hovering around $100 a barrel, people are wondering why prices are so high. While violence and instability in the Middle East is one reason, the ongoing weakening of the US Dollar is another. According to Congress’ Joint Economic Committee, the weakening of the dollar since 2008 has added 56.5 cents to the price of gasoline.

Of course, Obama’s Energy Secretary is a big fan of higher gas prices and wants to see “European price levels” here in the US.

I actually sat down with Christian TV station KNAT to discuss the issue of high gas prices and what, if anything, government should do about it. Shows will air at the following times:

Tuesday, May 31st at 1:30am
Thursday, June 2nd at 1:30am
Friday, June 3rd at 11am
Saturday, June 4th at 1:30am

and the station is carried on the following dial numbers:

Cable
COMCAST – ALBUQUERQUE, NM channel 23

National Providers
DIRECTV channel 372
DISH NETWORK channel 260
GLORYSTAR channel 2
SKY ANGEL channel 127

Broadcast
KNAT channel 23

Happy Memorial Day. If you want to do some reading on the Holiday, I recommend the book “Unbroken.” It is an amazing story and gives one an appreciation for what some people went through during WWII.

In case you missed, it, we released Bernalillo County worker salary data on our website this week. That generated a brief story on Channel 13:

I also recently taped what I am told will be a more involved story on the topic this Sunday, so keep your eyes peeled and follow us on Twitter @pgessing if you want to find out more up to date information on this and other RGF activities.

According to the Council on State Taxation and our good friends at Ernst & Young, New Mexico has the highest taxes in the nation on new investments made in that particular state. A link to the release can be found here and the full report can be downloaded in a pdf document here.

As the authors write in their introduction to the study:

This study provides a state-by-state comparison of the tax liabilities that new investments in selected industries or types of economic activities would incur in each state, taking into consideration state and local statutory tax provisions and the financial and economic characteristics of the new investments. The analysis focuses on capital investments in industries that have location choices, such as factories or headquarters, rather than those that are tied to a specific geography, such as retailers or hotels. The estimated tax burdens on selected investments are combined to provide an overall measure of the business tax competitiveness of each state.

In other words, the study explores how much it costs (in terms of taxes) to locate a business in New Mexico. Unfortunately, it looks like the answer is “too much” or “even more than it does in Washington, DC which is not a good thing.

It would seem that our gross receipts tax is a major factor along with our corporate tax rate.

We’ve been saying for years that New Mexico’s film incentive and loan programs were a boondoggle for taxpayers. Recently, Channel 13’s Larry Barker came to the same conclusion and filed this excellent report on the matter:

State film loans, a flop for taxpayers: krqe.com

Thankfully, Gov. Martinez has a far more reasonable view of the film program than did Gov. Richardson, but with boondoggles like this one, can we really trust politicians to pick and choose which industries are used to develop New Mexico’s economy?

New Mexico’s Environmental Improvement Board is at the center of the public policy debate once again. This time, it is hearing comments on a state implementation plan, known as a SIP, to address regional haze. A key part of this plan would require the installation of new technology at the San Juan Generating Station in the Four Corners area, but minimizes the cost to New Mexico electricity customers. As I wrote in a previous blog posting, the plan now before the EIB is far better than a second plan being pushed by the EPA and radical environmentalists.

The meetings take place next week:
June 1, 2011
9:00 a.m. (with public comment portion expected to start at 1 p.m.)
Room 307, NM State Capitol Building
490 Old Santa Fe Trail
Santa Fe, NM 87501
AND
June 2-4 (as necessary)
9:00 a.m.
Room 7103 (Little Theater), San Juan College
4601 College Blvd
Farmington, New Mexico 87402

Some basic information that might be considered for use in comments follows:

• The Environmental Improvement Board should adopt the draft State Implementation Plan as proposed by the New Mexico Environment Department.

• The draft state plan strikes the appropriate balance between minimizing cost impacts and protecting the environment.

• The state plan will lower NOx emissions by 4,900 tons per year at San Juan Generating Station. This, combined with recent environmental upgrades at San Juan, will result in an overall emissions reduction in NOx of 54% since 2005.

• The draft implementation plan proposed by the New Mexico Environment Department is the best option for PNM customers, especially those of us representing the business customer community. New Mexico businesses have been hit hard by the economic downturn and though many factors are impacting energy costs, this is one cost that impacts the cost of electricity that can be minimized with your adoption of this proposal.

• As you know, costs incurred at power plants are part of electric rates to customers. The environmental control technology, SNCR, called for in the proposal can be installed at San Juan for one-tenth the cost that would be incurred if U.S. EPA’s proposed plan for SCR is put into effect.

• In addition, the San Juan Generating Station and the San Juan Coal Mine that supplies fuel to the generating station are major employers in the Four Corners region and contribute to the economic health of the region and the state.

• SJGS employs 394 full-time workers, 20 percent of whom are Native American

• The San Juan mine employs 526 people, of whom 46% percent are Native American

• The plant pays millions of dollars a year in government taxes, including $54.8 M in coal royalties and taxes paid to governments and tribes and $6.4 M paid to in property tax to San Juan County.

• San Juan also purchases about $30 M in materials and supplies each year and hold approximately $122 M in contracts for outside services. The plant pays $280 M each year for coal and ash removal.

• Thank you for your consideration and I urge you to adopt the proposal recommended by the New Mexico Environment Department.